Earned Autonomy Framework
In July 2024, Houston ISD implemented the Defined Autonomy Framework (DAF), aligning levels of school autonomy with academic performance. The framework differentiated decision-making authority based on student outcomes and established consistent expectations across the system.
Over the past three years, the District has strengthened instructional quality, reinforced accountability standards, and built a performance-focused culture. During that time, HISD more than doubled the number of A- and B-rated schools. No student entered an F-rated campus at the start of the most recent school year, and 70,000 more students attended A- and B-rated campuses than the year prior. Student growth data across multiple grade levels have also shown measurable improvement, reflecting stronger instructional consistency across campuses.
This progress reflects the District’s commitment to the Houston Promise: that zip code will not determine opportunity, that every student attends a high-quality school, and that by August 2027 all HISD schools will be A- or B-rated.
With three years of accountability data now available, the District is positioned to strengthen its approach to autonomy. Beginning July 1, 2026, HISD will implement the Earned Autonomy Framework (EAF). The Earned Autonomy Framework moves from single-year determinations to sustained, multi-year performance standards and incorporates achievement gap measures into eligibility criteria. Autonomy will be based primarily on demonstrated results over time rather than school type.

The Earned Autonomy Framework (EAF) is guided by five principles that align decision-making authority with sustained academic performance and systemwide accountability.
- Sustained Performance Over Time: Autonomy is based on multi-year academic performance rather than a single year of results. Sustained outcomes provide a more accurate measure of campus effectiveness and leadership stability. Schools must demonstrate consistent performance across accountability cycles to earn higher levels of autonomy. This approach reduces volatility and ensures that expanded authority reflects durable success rather than short-term gains.
- Achievement as the Primary Determinant: Eligibility for autonomy levels is anchored in Texas Education Agency accountability ratings. These ratings reflect performance across student achievement, student progress, and closing the gaps measures under the state accountability system. For the highest levels of autonomy, achievement gap thresholds are also incorporated into eligibility criteria. This ensures that high overall performance is accompanied by progress across student groups
- Instructional Authority is Earned: The Earned Autonomy Framework differentiates authority over instructional systems. Under the Defined Autonomy Framework, instructional evaluation requirements were uniform across campuses. Under the EAF, schools demonstrating sustained high performance may apply for expanded authority over instructional delivery models, evaluation systems, and strategic design through performance agreements. Schools operating within Levels 3, 2, and 1 will continue to implement district instructional systems to ensure consistency and continuous improvement across the broader system.
- Contract-Based Autonomy for Highest Performers: The highest levels of autonomy (Levels 4 and 5) operate under formal performance agreements approved by the HISD Board of Managers. These agreements define the scope of authority, performance expectations, renewal timelines, and accountability conditions. This contract-based model formalizes autonomy while preserving transparency, governance oversight, and measurable performance standards.
- System Integrity and Stability: All schools, regardless of autonomy level, must comply with state and federal law and applicable accountability requirements. Levels 3, 2, and 1 operate within clearly defined district parameters related to curriculum alignment, instructional expectations, assessment, and student safety. The framework balances expanded authority for sustained high performers with consistent instructional quality across the system. It is designed to protect student outcomes while allowing successful campuses to innovate and scale effective practices.
